Sisters! Katie, Stephanie, and me before heading to Tokyo and Dodge. I look like a heifer in this picture, but that's ok. Katie and Steph look pretty like always!
Friday, July 31, 2009
Thursday, July 30, 2009
Wednesday, July 29, 2009
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
Monday, July 27, 2009
208/365
I think I have decided on material for curtains. We have no neighbors, but come harvest and deer season when I am home alone, it will be nice to have something covering up our back doors.
This is an old picture of the living room, but it shows the doors and the colors of the room.
Sunday, July 26, 2009
Saturday, July 25, 2009
Friday, July 24, 2009
205/365
Another pair of my second favorite flip-flops. I also got them in black. These are seriously some of the most comfortable shoes I have ever worn. I hear Dillard's carries them and not just boutiques.
Thursday, July 23, 2009
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Monday, July 20, 2009
Saturday, July 18, 2009
Friday, July 17, 2009
Thursday, July 16, 2009
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
Article
I ran across this article recently and found it very interesting. With our FET approaching, it gives me a little hope.
* * *
Frozen embryos 'better for IVF'
By Caroline Parkinson Health reporter, BBC News, Barcelona
Frozen is better than fresh when it comes to transplanting embryos in IVF treatment, a study shows.
Danish scientists found babies born after a frozen embryo was thawed and implanted had higher birth weights than those born from fresh embryos.
The study of over 19,000 babies also found no added risk of birth defects.
A European fertility conference heard frozen embryo babies did better because only the most robust embryos survived the freezing and thawing process.
“ If our results continue to be positive, it can be accepted as a completely safe procedure, which can be used more frequently than it is currently ” Dr Anja Pinborg Copenhagen University Hospital.
Freezing embryos allows couples to have several cycles of treatment from one egg collection.
That means it cuts the amount of times women have to take ovarian stimulation drugs.
Single embryos
As doctors want to avoid multiple pregnancies, it is common for just one embryo - which has been fertilised in the lab - to be transferred into the womb, and the rest frozen.
In later cycles, a frozen embryo is thawed and implanted three to five days after ovulation, exactly the same way as fresh embryos are used.
While single embryo transfers are becoming increasingly common, the researchers said there was little data on the results of using frozen embryos.
But earlier mouse studies had shown a higher rate of behavioural and development problems in animals born from frozen embryos.
In this study, presented to the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology meeting in Barcelona, all 1,200 babies who had been born from frozen embryos between 1995 and 2006 in Denmark were compared to the 17,800 babies born from fresh embryos.
The data showed no increase in the rate of congenital malformations - which include conditions such as spina bifida and cleft palate.
Fewer frozen embryo babies were admitted to neonatal care units, but the researchers said this was probably because there was a higher rate of multiple births in the fresh embryo group.
In addition, pregnancies lasted slightly longer in the frozen embryo group, and babies were an average around 200 grams bigger.
There was also a lower proportion of low-birth weight babies weighing under 2,500 grams (5.5lbs) and fewer premature births, before 37 weeks.
Survivors
Dr Anja Pinborg, who led the research, said: "We think the reason for the differences is probably positive selection of the embryos for frozen embryo replacement.
"Only the very top quality embryos survive the freezing and thawing process.
"And you only get pregnancies in patients with lots of good embryos to freeze."
She added that by the ovarian stimulation patients have to go through in order to get fresh embryos could negatively influence a consequent pregnancy - something women using frozen embryos would not be affected by.
Dr Pinborg said: "The findings are reassuring.
"If our results continue to be positive, it can be accepted as a completely safe procedure, which can be used more frequently than it is currently."
* * *
I find that I am putting this off as each month approaches. I said we would do this in July, then it was August and now I am thinking maybe September. I don't know for sure why, but I think it's just knowing we have those 2 frozen embryos and that they could potentially lead to success. And hope. Having those 2 gives me an ounce of hope (something that is hard to come by these days). If we use them and it does not work, I am left with nothing, no hope and nothing to look forward to and think "there is still a chance." It's kind of a security thing maybe? Our safety net? I don't really know how to explain it. I just feel like keeping them for as long as we can reminds me that we might still have a shot without going through the whole process again. The chances of success are so low with a FET and I know that. I guess that may be another reason I am hesitant to do the transfer. I don't want to go through another failure. It sucks. The emotions and everything associated with it, sucks.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)